About TalentMed

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far TalentMed has created 17 blog entries.

ICD-10-AM Fourteenth Edition: What the 2028 Changeover Means for Clinical Coders

Australia’s hospital classification has a new edition on the way, and the timetable is now public. In its Work Program 2026-27, published on 21 July 2026, the Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority (IHACPA) confirmed that work on ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Fourteenth Edition and AR-DRG Version 13.0 begins this financial year. Completion is intended by June 2028, with the Fourteenth Edition used for separations from 1 July 2028.

If you are starting out in clinical coding, that date matters more than it might look. Someone who enrols in a coding diploma this spring will train on the current Thirteenth Edition, start work on it, and then see the Fourteenth arrive within their first few years on the job. Knowing how an edition is built, what changes when one lands, and how to keep up is part of the trade.

What IHACPA’s work program says

Australian hospitals code every admitted patient episode using three linked products. ICD-10-AM classifies diagnoses, ACHI classifies procedures and interventions, and the Australian Coding Standards (ACS) govern how the first two are applied. Together they are known as ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS, and IHACPA refines them on a three-year cycle.

The work program sets out the current cycle plainly:

  • Thirteenth Edition is the edition in use, applicable for separations from 1 July 2025.
  • Fourteenth Edition development commences in 2026-27, with completion intended by June 2028 and implementation from 1 July 2028.
  • AR-DRG Version 12.0, the grouper that turns coded episodes into funding classes, was released in July 2025 and prices admitted acute care from 1 July 2026 under the National Efficient Price Determination 2026-27.
  • AR-DRG Version 13.0 is intended for release in July 2028 and implementation from 1 July 2029.

Notice the two calendars running a year apart. Coders move to a new edition in July of one year. The AR-DRG version built on that edition is released at the same time, but hospitals are not priced on it until the following July. That year gives hospitals, states and territories and software vendors time to implement the new version, and gives IHACPA time to calibrate the price weights. Hospital cost data reaches the pricing model roughly two years after the coding is done, so the coding a coder does in 2028-29 shapes funding for several years afterwards.

How an edition actually gets built

IHACPA has not published a Fourteenth Edition timetable beyond those dates, but the Thirteenth Edition cycle shows what the process looks like.

The priorities come from working coders and clinicians. For the Thirteenth Edition, IHACPA drafted development work programs in November 2022, built from issues held over from earlier editions, public submissions, and feedback on its annual pricing framework consultation. Anyone can lodge a submission through the Australian Classification Exchange (ACE), IHACPA’s public portal for classification change requests. A total of 67 public submissions were reviewed for the Thirteenth Edition, each listed with its outcome in the published Summary of Updates.

Clinicians check the clinical content. The Classifications Clinical Advisory Group advises on development proposals, with members drawn from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, the Australian College of Nursing, Allied Health Professions Australia and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Proposed changes are also assessed against ICD-11 and other countries’ modifications of ICD-10.

The public sees the major changes before they are final. IHACPA released a consultation paper on the proposed major changes for the Thirteenth Edition and AR-DRG Version 12.0 on 2 November 2023, with submissions closing on 1 December 2023. Sixteen submissions came in, from state health departments, individual hospitals and clinical colleges. That was about 20 months before the edition took effect.

Then the materials roll out. Thirteenth Edition material was released in stages from April 2025: the books, electronic code lists, mapping tables, a Reference to Changes document, and the Chronicle, which traces changes to ICD-10-AM codes, ACHI codes and the standards across every edition. Education followed, so coders could learn the changes before 1 July. If the Fourteenth Edition follows the same shape, working coders can expect a consultation paper on the major changes some time in the second half of 2027, then a staged release of materials in the first half of 2028. Those are inferences from the last cycle, not announced dates.

What changes when an edition lands, in numbers

An edition change sounds sweeping. IHACPA’s published figures for the Thirteenth Edition show what one really involves.

Section Valid codes in Thirteenth Edition Changes from Twelfth Edition
ICD-10-AM disease, status and external cause codes 17,337 123 created, 26 inactivated, 393 titles amended
ACHI intervention codes 6,651 312 created, 166 inactivated, 165 titles amended
Australian Coding Standards 118 1 created, 23 deleted, 32 titles amended

Read the proportions.

Fewer than one per cent of the diagnosis codes were new. Procedure codes moved more, largely because ACHI absorbs Medicare Benefits Schedule updates (July 2020 to March 2023 in that edition) and a new Australian Schedule of Dental Services. Standards saw the biggest clean-out, with 23 retired.

One of the most significant changes in the Thirteenth Edition was structural rather than a list of new codes. Cluster coding, supported by the new ACS 0004 Diagnosis cluster identifier, lets related diagnosis codes be linked as a group. It arrived in a first stage covering external cause clusters and chronic condition supplementary codes, and it prepares Australian data for a potential future implementation of ICD-11, where clustering is a feature.

So a coder moving from one edition to the next carries almost the whole classification with them. What they relearn is the delta, using the Reference to Changes, the Chronicle and the edition education, plus a fresh eye for the standards that were retired or rewritten.

The separation date rule

An edition applies according to the date the patient separated from hospital, not the date they were admitted. Twelfth Edition covered separations from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2025, and the Thirteenth applies to separations from 1 July 2025. A patient admitted in late June 2025 who went home in July was coded to the Thirteenth Edition.

On 1 July 2028 the same rule will apply. Either side of a changeover, a coder can be finishing older episodes on one edition while coding new separations on the next, which is why the education and the Reference to Changes matter so much beforehand.

What this means if you are training now

A classification that is rebuilt every three years, with quarterly National Coding Advice in between, rewards a particular kind of worker. Coders who do well treat the classification as something that moves, and know where to look when it does.

That means three habits from day one. Learn the current edition properly, because everything the Fourteenth changes will be described in relation to it. Get comfortable reading IHACPA’s own documents rather than second-hand summaries. And follow the development cycle as it unfolds, because the consultation paper on the Fourteenth Edition will be the first public look at the classification you will work on for the three years after that.

Behind this cycle sits a bigger question. Australia has not yet decided whether or when to replace ICD-10-AM with ICD-11. A business case is being prepared by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for governments in late 2026, and IHACPA’s work program includes further ICD-11 validation work. Whatever governments decide, the Fourteenth Edition is being built, and ICD-10-AM remains the classification Australian coders will be using for years yet.

Becoming a clinical coder does not require a clinical background. It requires attention to detail, comfort with structured reference material, and a willingness to keep learning. Once qualified, the Clinical Coders’ Society of Australia (CCSA) offers professional development and a community of practice for staying current through cycles like this one.

Common questions

IHACPA’s Work Program 2026-27 states that the Fourteenth Edition is intended to be completed by June 2028 and implemented from 1 July 2028. Development commences in the 2026-27 financial year.

The Thirteenth Edition, which applies to separations from 1 July 2025. It replaced the Twelfth Edition, which covered separations from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2025. National Coding Advice, published quarterly by IHACPA, is used alongside the Thirteenth Edition.

Not from scratch. Most of the classification carries over. For the Thirteenth Edition, 123 diagnosis codes were created out of 17,337, and 312 procedure codes out of 6,651. Coders learn the changes through IHACPA’s Reference to Changes, the Chronicle and edition education before implementation.

No decision has been made either way. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare is preparing a business case for governments in late 2026 on the scope of any ICD-11 implementation. In the meantime, IHACPA is continuing to develop ICD-10-AM, and the Thirteenth Edition’s cluster coding was designed partly with a future ICD-11 transition in mind.

No. The HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding teaches anatomy, physiology, medical terminology and the classification from the ground up. Coders come from administration, allied health, science and other backgrounds.

Learn to code to the current Australian standard

The HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding teaches ICD-10-AM, ACHI and the Australian Coding Standards as they are used in Australian hospitals today, along with the habits that carry a coder through each new edition. It is 100% online and self-paced over 12 months, and you can start any day of the year.

Explore the Diploma of Clinical Coding →

Sources: Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority (IHACPA), IHACPA Work Program 2026-27 (21 July 2026); IHACPA, Summary of Updates for ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Thirteenth Edition (2025); IHACPA, Development of ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Thirteenth Edition and AR-DRG Version 12.0, Consultation Paper (November 2023); IHACPA ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS classification pages; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, ICD-11 in Australia.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Course information is current at the time of writing. For current fees, intakes and entry requirements, see the course page.

HLT50321

Diploma of Clinical Coding

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Clinical Coding.

Book a call

Clinical coding news

Monthly updates on classifications, coding standards and coder careers in Australia.

5 Essential Skills Every Aspiring Clinical Coder Needs

You’re exhausted. The long shifts, the emotional weight of bedside care, the feeling that your expertise deserves more recognition and more flexibility. If you’ve been quietly Googling “work from home healthcare jobs” or “how to get out of clinical nursing,” you’re not alone. Thousands of Australian healthcare professionals make the same search every year.

What many of them discover: clinical coding is a rewarding, flexible career path within the Australian health system. But it’s also widely misunderstood. It’s not data entry. It’s not administrative grunt work. Clinical coding is a highly specialised, intellectually demanding profession that sits at the intersection of clinical medicine and hospital funding.

To thrive as a clinical coder, you need a very specific set of skills. The great news? If you already work in healthcare, you likely have more of these skills than you realise. These are the five essential skills every aspiring clinical coder needs, and how TalentMed’s HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding helps you build every single one.

Why These Skills Matter for Your Coding Career

Clinical coding is not the kind of profession where you can learn on the job through trial and error. The stakes are too high. Every coded patient episode directly affects hospital funding through Australia’s Activity Based Funding (ABF) model, feeds into national health data collections, and influences how resources are allocated across the health system. Inaccurate coding costs hospitals real money and can compromise the integrity of the clinical data that governments rely on for health policy decisions.

That is why building the right foundation of skills early in your training is so important. Aspiring coders who invest in developing strong medical terminology, attention to detail, classification knowledge, communication skills, and adaptability from the outset build a stronger foundation for their coding career, entering the workforce more confident and better prepared.

In short, the five skills outlined below are not abstract ideals. They are the practical, measurable competencies that employers actively look for when hiring graduate coders, and the same competencies that separate coders who plateau early from those who build long, rewarding careers.

Skill 1: Medical Terminology and Anatomy Knowledge

Clinical coders work directly with patient medical records: discharge summaries, operation reports, pathology results, and specialist consultation notes. If you can’t read and interpret clinical language confidently, you simply can’t code accurately.

Understanding medical terminology and human anatomy isn’t just helpful; it’s essential. When a surgeon documents a “right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis” or a physician notes “community-acquired pneumonia with associated type 2 respiratory failure,” the coder must understand exactly what happened clinically before they can assign the correct ICD-10-AM and ACHI codes.

Why does this matter? Because the ICD-10-AM (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, Australian Modification) is built around precise clinical concepts. A coder who misreads “septicaemia” as interchangeable with “sepsis” or confuses “cellulitis” with a superficial skin wound can cause a cascade of incorrect coding decisions. Incorrect codes change the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) assigned to a patient episode, and that directly affects how much funding a hospital receives from IHACPA under the Activity Based Funding (ABF) model.

How the HLT50321 Diploma builds this skill: TalentMed’s diploma programme includes dedicated units covering medical terminology, human body systems, and disease processes. You’ll learn to read clinical notes the same way a doctor does, with confidence and precision.

Skill 2: Meticulous Attention to Detail

In clinical coding, a single incorrect digit is not a minor typo. It can have serious financial and clinical consequences.

Consider this real-world scenario: A patient is admitted with a hip fracture and also has Type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is managed during the admission. The coder must identify both the principal diagnosis (the hip fracture) and the relevant complication or comorbidity (the diabetes). If the diabetes is missed as an additional diagnosis, the DRG assignment changes. The hospital may receive thousands of dollars less in funding for that episode than it is legitimately owed.

Now multiply that across hundreds of patient episodes per week. The financial and clinical data integrity stakes are enormous. Coders must comb through every page of a medical record, sometimes 40 or 50 pages, and capture every clinically relevant diagnosis and procedure. Nothing can be assumed. Nothing can be skipped.

Attention to detail also applies to Australian Coding Standards (ACS) compliance. Each coding decision must be defensible according to the ACS rules published by IHACPA (the Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority). The standards are precise, and so must the coder be.

How the HLT50321 Diploma builds this skill: Through authentic case-based assessments using simulated medical records, students practise applying coding rules under realistic conditions, building the habit of thoroughness from day one.

Skill 3: In-Depth Knowledge of ICD-10-AM, ACHI, and the ACS

This is the technical core of clinical coding. The three reference systems every Australian clinical coder must master are:

  • ICD-10-AM: the classification system used to assign codes to diagnoses and health conditions. Australia uses its own modification of the global ICD-10, updated periodically by IHACPA to reflect Australian clinical practice.
  • ACHI (Australian Classification of Health Interventions): the classification system for procedures, interventions, and operations performed during a hospital stay.
  • ACS (Australian Coding Standards): the rulebook. The ACS provides the specific rules and guidelines for how codes from ICD-10-AM and ACHI must be selected and sequenced. It is updated by IHACPA and determines how coders handle ambiguous, complex, or multi-condition patient episodes.

Without deep knowledge of all three systems, a coder cannot function. These aren’t tools you can “look up as you go.” You need to understand the underlying logic and structure of each classification to apply them correctly in complex cases.

Knowledge of DRG (Diagnosis-Related Group) logic is also critical. Every coded episode is ultimately grouped into a DRG, which determines hospital funding under the IHACPA’s national pricing framework. Understanding how diagnosis and procedure codes interact to produce a DRG is what separates a competent coder from an exceptional one.

How the HLT50321 Diploma builds this skill: The diploma is specifically structured around ICD-10-AM, ACHI, and ACS mastery. Students work through each classification system progressively, applying real coding rules to progressively more complex clinical scenarios. By the time you graduate, this knowledge is second nature.

Skill 4: Professional Communication Skills

Many people picture clinical coding as a purely solitary, screen-based role. The role is more nuanced and more interesting than that.

When a medical record contains ambiguous, incomplete, or contradictory clinical documentation, a coder cannot simply guess or make assumptions. They must raise a formal clinical query with the treating clinician. This might involve contacting a busy surgeon to clarify whether a complication was present on admission, or asking a physician to confirm the specific type of heart failure documented in a patient’s notes.

This requires real communication skill. Clinicians are time-poor. A well-written, precise clinical query gets a quick, useful response. A vague or poorly worded query gets ignored or creates confusion. Coders who communicate well maintain positive working relationships with medical staff and consistently produce higher-quality, more defensible coded data.

Communication skills also matter when coders present audit findings, explain coding decisions to management, or participate in clinical documentation improvement (CDI) programmes. CDI is a growing area of Australian healthcare where coders actively work with clinicians to improve the quality of medical record documentation, directly improving data quality and funding outcomes.

How the HLT50321 Diploma builds this skill: The diploma includes units on workplace communication in healthcare settings, giving students the confidence and professional vocabulary to query clinicians effectively and collaborate across multidisciplinary teams.

Skill 5: Adaptability and a Commitment to Continuous Learning

Healthcare never stands still, and neither do the coding standards.

IHACPA regularly releases new editions of the ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS classification, incorporating new diseases, updated clinical terminology, revised coding rules, and new procedure codes for emerging surgical techniques. Each edition brings changes that coders must learn and apply from the effective date.

Beyond classification updates, the broader Australian health information sector is also shifting. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are now standard across most public hospitals. Computer-Assisted Coding (CAC) technology, powered by artificial intelligence, is being adopted in larger health networks. Casemix funding models continue to evolve under IHACPA’s national hospital pricing framework. Coders who stay curious, attend professional development events, and actively engage with the Clinical Coders’ Society of Australia (CCSA) are the ones who thrive.

The best clinical coders view each classification update not as a burden, but as evidence that their profession is dynamic, respected, and central to how Australia funds and manages its health system.

How the HLT50321 Diploma builds this skill: TalentMed’s programme is delivered online with flexible pacing, modelling the self-directed learning habits you’ll rely on throughout your career. You’ll also be introduced to the CCSA and the professional development resources available to qualified coders.

Do You Have What It Takes? Self-Assessment Checklist

Work through this list carefully. If you tick even three or four of these boxes, you may be readier than you expect:

  • I am comfortable reading clinical or medical language (even if I’m not a clinician)
  • I pay close attention to detail in my current role and rarely make careless errors
  • I enjoy problem-solving and figuring out the “right” answer according to a set of rules
  • I am comfortable working independently for extended periods
  • I can communicate professionally in writing with colleagues or clinicians
  • I am a self-motivated learner who keeps up with changes in my field
  • I am interested in how Australian hospitals are funded and how health data is used
  • I want a career with flexibility, stability, and strong earning potential

Frequently Asked Questions

Not necessarily. While a background in nursing, allied health, or medical administration is helpful, it is not a requirement. The HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding is open to career changers from a wide range of backgrounds. The diploma itself teaches you the medical terminology and anatomy knowledge you need. What matters most is your attention to detail, analytical thinking, and commitment to learning.
With dedicated study, most students complete the HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding within 12 months. Many students find that skills like attention to detail and communication develop rapidly once they begin applying them in realistic coding scenarios during their assessments. Technical knowledge of ICD-10-AM and the ACS takes more time to build, but TalentMed’s structured programme guides you through this progressively.
ICD-10-AM stands for the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification. It is the official classification system used to record diagnoses in Australian hospitals. Every coded patient episode contributes to national health data collections and determines hospital funding through the Activity Based Funding (ABF) model administered by IHACPA. Getting the codes right matters: for hospitals, for patients, and for the integrity of Australia’s health data.
Yes. Many experienced clinical coders in Australia work fully remotely or on a hybrid basis. Once you have established your accuracy and productivity in a hospital setting, remote work is a realistic and common arrangement. This is one of the reasons clinical coding attracts so many healthcare professionals who want better work-life balance without leaving the health sector entirely.
Clinical coding is a stable and established profession in Australia. Every hospital admission requires coded data for funding, reporting and planning purposes, and health information management remains a recognised, ongoing specialisation within the health workforce.

Ready to Start Your Clinical Coding Career?

You don’t need to have all five skills perfectly in place before you start. That’s exactly what the HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding is for.

TalentMed’s fully online, nationally recognised diploma builds your medical terminology knowledge, your technical coding expertise, and your professional communication skills, all in a flexible, self-paced format designed for working adults. If you’re a nurse considering a change, a medical administrator ready to step up, or a school leaver with a passion for healthcare, this diploma is your pathway in.

Enquire today and speak with one of our friendly course advisors about whether the HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding is right for you.

Enquire Now

Care Minutes Audits: What Aged Care Providers Must Prove by 31 October

Every residential aged care provider in Australia has a new deadline on 31 October 2026. On that date the 2025-26 Aged Care Financial Report falls due, and for the first time it has to carry a Care Minutes Performance Statement that an external auditor has signed off. The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing has confirmed the audit sits under ASAE 3000 at reasonable assurance, which is the highest level of assurance an audit can give.

That single line changes the size of the job. An auditor working to reasonable assurance does not accept a summary report from a rostering system. They trace numbers back to signed timesheets, electronic verification logs and payroll. Whether a provider can survive that depends almost entirely on work that had to happen months ago, inside the organisation, by people doing the kind of evidence and controls work that sits at the centre of quality auditing.

What the Care Minutes Performance Statement is

Care minutes are the amount of direct care time a residential aged care home delivers per resident per day. Providers already report them quarterly. What is new is an annual statement, externally audited, that becomes the finalised view of care time for the whole year.

Money is the reason it exists. From 1 April 2026 part of the Base Care Tariff for non-specialised metropolitan homes was replaced by a care minutes supplement, paid according to performance against the care minutes responsibility. Once funding follows reported minutes, the Government needs assurance that the reported minutes are real. Homes that received the supplement can have it recalculated if the audited statement disagrees with what was reported through the quarterly financial reports during the year.

Element Detail
Who it applies to All registered providers of residential aged care, for every home they operate
First deadline 31 October 2026, inside the 2025-26 Aged Care Financial Report, for providers on a standard financial year
First period covered Quarters 3 and 4 of 2025-26, plus registered nurse coverage data from November 2025
What is reported Quarterly direct care labour costs and worked hours including agency staff, monthly 24/7 registered nurse coverage, and quarterly occupied bed days
Audit standard ASAE 3000, reasonable assurance, performed by a registered company auditor
If it is not done A breach of section 166-335 of the Aged Care Rules 2025, which may attract a civil penalty under the Aged Care Act 2024

After this year it becomes an ongoing annual requirement.

Reasonable assurance is a higher bar than it sounds

Assurance engagements come at two levels. Limited assurance is the lighter one, where the practitioner does enough work to say nothing has come to their attention suggesting the subject matter is wrong. Reasonable assurance requires the practitioner to gather enough evidence to positively express an opinion that the statement is free from material misstatement.

Guidance for auditors from the department is direct about what that means in practice: more extensive evidence gathering and detailed testing. Auditors are pointed at both sides of the work. They test whether the provider’s internal controls over care time capture were properly designed and actually implemented, and they run substantive testing on the numbers themselves, including tracing reported care time against what staff logged, recalculating recorded hours, vouching reported minutes to signed timesheets or electronic verification logs, reconciling paid hours to reported hours in payroll, and cut-off testing at period boundaries.

Read that list as a provider rather than as an auditor and it becomes a checklist of records that either exist or do not. A payroll reconciliation only works if paid hours and reported hours were ever captured in a way that can be lined up. None of this can be assembled in October for care that was delivered in April.

The work sits inside the provider, not with the auditor

Only a registered company auditor, or another auditor approved by the department, can perform the audit of the statement itself. That is a narrow, licensed role, and it is not the job most people in aged care quality will do.

Far more of the work sits on the provider side, and there is a lot of it. Someone has to know which systems feed the statement and how they connect, because the department’s guidance explicitly notes that timesheet and care minute information can be affected by payroll systems that sit inside the financial statement audit. A second person has to test the controls before the auditor does, so that a weakness turns up as an internal finding in June rather than a qualified opinion in October. A third has to reconcile the draft statement against previously lodged quarterly reports and write the explanation for every difference, because the statement includes a section for exactly that and the department has said providers should not simply copy the old figures across. Then the findings that come back have to be handled, and the fix has to hold.

That is internal audit and quality assurance work. That distinction matters if you are weighing up study or a career move, so it is worth reading our guide to the difference between internal and external auditors in healthcare before you decide which side of the line you want to be on.

What a provider can still do before 31 October

Evidence for 2025-26 is already made or already missing. What is still open is how well the provider can find it, explain it and defend it.

  • Map every system that feeds the statement, from time and attendance through to payroll and the care system, and name who owns each one.
  • Run your own reconciliation of the draft statement against the quarterly financial reports you already lodged, then write the variance explanations while the reasons are still known.
  • Sample your own records the way an auditor would. Pick a handful of shifts and try to trace each one from the roster to a signed timesheet or verification log to payroll.
  • Check agency hours specifically. They are in scope, and they usually travel through a different paper trail from employee hours.
  • Talk to your auditor early about what they will ask for, and use the department’s published templates and guidance rather than inventing a format.
  • Fix the capture process now for 2026-27, when the statement covers a full twelve months instead of two quarters.

Aged care has been moving this way for a while. The strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards already turned broad expectations into specific, checkable actions. This statement extends the same logic to funding, and it is stricter, because the test is no longer a regulator’s assessment but an audit opinion.

Common questions

It forms part of the 2025-26 Aged Care Financial Report, due on 31 October 2026 for registered providers reporting on a standard financial year cycle. For this first year only, the statement covers quarters 3 and 4 of 2025-26 plus registered nurse coverage data from November 2025.
A registered company auditor, or another auditor approved by the department in line with section 166-335 of the Aged Care Rules 2025. That engagement is performed under ASAE 3000, the assurance standard for engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information.
Limited assurance is the lower level, where the practitioner does enough work to state that nothing has come to their attention indicating a material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is the highest level available, and it requires the practitioner to gather enough evidence to positively express an opinion that the subject matter is free from material misstatement. The Care Minutes Performance Statement requires reasonable assurance.
Failing to meet the audit requirement is a breach of section 166-335 of the Aged Care Rules 2025, and a provider may attract a civil penalty under the Aged Care Act 2024. Separately, homes that received the care minutes supplement may have it recalculated where the audited statement differs from what was reported in earlier quarterly financial reports.
The ASAE 3000 engagement itself must be performed by a registered company auditor, which is a licensed accounting role. The provider-side work of building evidence trails, testing internal controls and running internal audits is a different job, and people come to it from nursing, care management, administration and quality roles. The BSB50920 Diploma of Quality Auditing covers auditing management systems, planning and leading audits, and reporting findings. Entry requirements and fees are on the course page.

Interested in the work that gets an organisation ready for an audit rather than the audit itself? Explore the BSB50920 Diploma of Quality Auditing, delivered 100% online and self-paced over 12 months with daily intakes, or read the quality auditing career guide.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Nationally recognised training delivered online across Australia. This article summarises publicly available Department of Health, Disability and Ageing material about the Care Minutes Performance Statement and its audit requirements, current at 7 September 2026. It is not financial, audit or legal advice, and it is not a substitute for the department’s published guidance.

BSB50920

Diploma of Quality Auditing

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Quality Auditing.

Book a call

Quality and audit news

Monthly updates for auditors and quality teams in Australian healthcare and aged care.

Why Healthcare Documentation Still Needs a Human in the Loop

A woman in Australia agreed to have her specialist appointment transcribed by artificial intelligence. Months later she read the letter her specialist had sent to her GP and found a line saying she had been micro-dosing psychedelic mushrooms, offered as a possible explanation for bleeding around her kidneys. She had never taken them. Nobody had said it in the room. The ABC reported the case on 14 August 2026.

Software invented a clinical fact. That is the failure everyone talks about. Then the letter went to another doctor, and between the machine writing that line and it arriving in his inbox, no person read it against what actually happened in the consultation.

That gap is a job. It is most of what a healthcare documentation specialist does, and the reason the role is getting harder to automate rather than easier.

The six ways AI gets a record wrong

Transcription and summarisation tools fail in patterned, repeatable ways. Once you know the patterns, you can check for them deliberately instead of reading hopefully and trusting your eye to catch something.

The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners estimated last year that 40 per cent of GPs were regularly using AI scribes, and described that figure as conservative. So these patterns are now running through a large share of Australian primary care documentation.

Six failure modes cover almost everything that goes wrong.

Failure mode What it looks like in a record What catches it
Fabrication A clinical fact that was never said by anyone. An invented drug history, as above, is this category. Checking every clinical assertion back to a source. If nothing in the encounter supports it, it does not belong in the record.
Laterality error Left becomes right. Digital Rights Watch documented a case where a scribe recorded the wrong breast in a cancer diagnosis. Reading the site against the rest of the record: the referral, the imaging request, the operation note. Sides have to agree across documents.
Negation flip “No history of epilepsy” becomes “history of epilepsy”. Digital Rights Watch found exactly this. Reading specifically for negation. Small words carry the whole meaning, and they are the easiest to lose in a summary.
Numerical error A dose, a unit or a frequency transposed. Ten milligrams becomes one hundred. Checking whether the number is plausible for that drug, that route and that patient, rather than only checking it was typed accurately.
Omission Something said in the room that never reached the note. The hardest failure to see, because nothing on the page looks wrong. Working to a structured template for the report type, so a missing section is visible as an absence rather than invisible.
Misattribution A family member’s history recorded as the patient’s, or a question the clinician asked recorded as something the patient reported. Tracking who said what through the encounter, and keeping reported history separate from examination findings.

None of these are exotic. Five of the six are things a trained medical transcriptionist has always checked for, because human dictation produces the same errors. What differs is the tone of the output. A tired human typist produces text that reads like it was produced by a tired human. A language model produces fluent, confident, plausible prose, and a wrong statement in fluent prose is much harder to notice than a wrong statement in garbled prose.

Speaking to the ABC, a Perth GP who chairs the RACGP’s digital health and innovation group and advises one of the scribe vendors put the practical version of it plainly: the classic error is getting the side of the body wrong, saying right when you said left, so doses and sides need close checking.

A wrong line does not stay where it was written

A single fabricated sentence matters this much because health records travel. The correspondence in the ABC’s report went from a specialist to a GP. In the ordinary course of care it would then inform the next consultation, the next referral, and any clinician who opens the file in five years without knowing where the line came from.

Records travel beyond clinical care as well. The patient in that report was receiving workers’ compensation at the time and worried the false drug reference could affect her claim, which is not far-fetched. Health information is read by insurers, by compensation schemes, by employers in some circumstances, and by patients themselves. A sentence that reads smoothly and sits in the right place in a letter carries the authority of the whole document.

So the cost of an unchecked draft is every decision made downstream of it.

The checking degrades before the technology does

The chief executive of the Consumers Health Forum of Australia, who is leading a research project on AI medical scribes, described the pattern this way: for the first few weeks of using AI, people check things pretty carefully, and then at a point they stop checking, because they assume it will be right.

That is a well-documented human tendency called automation bias, and it does not mean clinicians are careless. It means accuracy that depends on a busy person staying permanently sceptical about a tool that is usually correct is accuracy built on sand. As the tool gets better the error rate falls, and that falling error rate is precisely what erodes the vigilance that catches the errors that remain.

Australia’s regulator of medical practitioners, AHPRA, is clear that clinicians must check all output from an AI scribe for accuracy to meet their professional obligations. That obligation is not in doubt. What is in doubt is the structure behind it, because an obligation held by one distracted person at the end of a long clinic is not a system.

What fixes this is dull and effective. Someone whose actual job is the document, trained in what a report of that type must contain, reads it against a template and treats the AI draft as a draft rather than as a record.

Consent is the other half of the picture. The Digital Rights Watch report found large differences in how consent is obtained, from a sign in the waiting room, which does not meet privacy law requirements, through to patients being refused appointments when they decline. The same report noted people may hold back on sensitive matters, including family violence, when they know AI is listening. Whatever a practice decides, someone has to write that process down, keep it current and make sure the front desk applies it consistently.

The regulator has moved from reviewing to enforcing

Eleven days before the ABC report, at the Australian Institute of Digital Health HIC2026 conference in Sydney on 3 August 2026, the Therapeutic Goods Administration said its review of digital scribes had moved into compliance action. Tracey Duffy, who heads the TGA’s product quality division, told the conference the regulator had spent twelve months engaging with vendors and was shifting to enforcement against organisations that had deployed a scribe operating as a medical device without seeking medical device approval.

Her findings were specific: scope creep, AI functions influencing the decisions of clinicians, a general lack of transparency about how products are managed once they are out in the field, and gaps in monitoring controls for foreseeable risks. She said action could go out over the following twelve months, and that the TGA would publish the review outcomes and updated guidance for developers.

Very little about the rules themselves is changing. The TGA’s broader review found the existing legislative framework fit for purpose, needing refinements rather than new laws. What has changed is that the line those rules draw is being enforced.

The line is narrow. Software that only listens and drafts sits outside the medical device framework. Software that starts shaping a clinical decision crosses into it. We covered where the line sits in our earlier piece on AI scribes and the future of documentation work. What has changed since is that the regulator has looked, found non-compliance, and said so publicly.

For anyone working in health information, the human review step is now the thing the regulator checks for. A busy practice can no longer quietly drop it.

The job is to produce, check and safeguard the record

AI now drafts the note. A qualified human checks it. That sentence is close to a job description for a healthcare documentation specialist, and it is a different job from the one the role used to be sold as.

Typing was never the whole of it, but typing is the part the software has taken. What remains needs judgement. A documentation specialist reads a draft against its source, knows what a document of that type has to contain, decides what belongs in a record and what does not, and knows how to raise and correct an error once a document has already been sent.

Where you sit matters as much as what you know. Someone in that role reads across a whole run of correspondence rather than sitting inside one consultation, so a contradiction between two letters is visible to them in a way it is not to the clinician who dictated either one. Someone reading only the note in front of them has no reason to notice that last month’s letter said the other side.

That is also the answer to whether the work is going away. Software can draft a document. It cannot hold professional accountability for what the document says, cannot be named when a record is queried, and cannot go back to the treating clinician to ask what was actually meant. Our earlier piece on medical editing and proofreading versus transcription sets out how that shift has already changed the day-to-day work.

What the checking skill is actually made of

“Check the AI output” sounds like proofreading, and treating it as proofreading is how errors survive. Proofreading asks whether the text is well formed. Checking a clinical document asks whether it is true, complete and internally consistent, which needs knowledge the text itself does not contain.

  • Medical terminology deep enough to hear a wrong word. Many AI errors are near-homophones of the correct term. If you do not know both words, the wrong one reads perfectly. Our guide to dangerous abbreviations covers a related trap.
  • Anatomy and physiology as a plausibility filter. Knowing which findings can and cannot occur together is what makes a fabricated line stand out from a real one.
  • Report structure by document type. A discharge summary, an operation report and a specialist letter each have a required shape. Knowing the shape is what turns an omission into something you can see. Our overview of the report types transcribed in Australia sets these out.
  • Documentation standards and style conventions. Consistent conventions are what let the next reader, and the next system, interpret a record the way it was meant. The AAMT style guide is the Australian reference point.
  • Privacy and records governance. Knowing what may be recorded, who may see it, how a patient has it corrected, and how long it is kept.
  • The judgement to escalate. Knowing when a document cannot be fixed by editing and has to go back to the clinician who wrote it.

All of that is teachable. It is a body of knowledge applied methodically, which is what a qualification is for, rather than a talent for spotting mistakes.

The 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation is built around producing, checking and safeguarding health information. Study covers the Australian health system and how records move through it, privacy and medico-legal obligations, advanced clinical terminology, producing and editing healthcare documents, AI in healthcare documentation, and professional practice. Graduates work in roles including medical records and health information officer positions, AI documentation review, documentation and transcription services, in-house roles in practices and hospitals, and independent contracting from home. Transcription sits inside that as one applied skill the course builds, rather than the whole of the job.

What patients can do now

In the ABC report, the patient found the error only because she read the post-operative letter her specialist sent to her GP, and she was worried about what a false drug reference might do to a workers’ compensation claim. She said afterwards that she loves AI, but that the essential ingredient is the human, and that what happened came down to a lack of human involvement.

Three practical things follow from that.

  • Ask for copies of letters written about you. Access and correction rights for health information come from the Privacy Act 1988 and state health records legislation, and reading the letters is the only way you will find an error in them.
  • Consent is yours to give or withhold. You can ask whether AI is being used, what happens to the recording, and you can decline without justifying yourself.
  • If you find something wrong, ask for it to be corrected in writing, and ask that the correction be sent to everyone who received the original.

Technology is going to keep improving, and it should. Scribes give clinicians their attention back, which is worth having. But a health record is a legal document, a clinical handover and a funding instrument at the same time, and someone has to read the draft against reality before it becomes all three.

Common questions

Yes. Consent needs to be informed and freely given, and you can decline. The Digital Rights Watch report found practices vary widely in how they ask, from a sign in the waiting room, which does not meet privacy law requirements, to a question at every appointment. You can also ask what happens to the recording and how long it is kept.
Not in the way many people assume. Around a dozen are available in Australia and none have been approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, because a product that claims to only transcribe and summarise falls outside the medical device framework. The TGA treats software that suggests a diagnosis or treatment plan as a medical device, and has acknowledged that some scribes may be operating in breach.
It depends on what the software does, not on who reads the output afterwards. A scribe that listens to a consultation and drafts a note for a clinician to review sits outside the medical device framework. The Therapeutic Goods Administration has said that software which goes further and influences a clinical decision can meet the definition of a medical device, and in August 2026 it said it was moving to compliance action against organisations that had deployed a scribe operating as a medical device without seeking approval.
You can ask for access to your health record, including correspondence such as a specialist letter to your GP, and you can ask for a correction if something in it is wrong. Access and correction rights come from the Privacy Act 1988 and state health records legislation. Raising it with the practice that created the document is usually the first step, and it is worth asking that the correction be sent to everyone who received the original.
The clinician. AHPRA’s position is that practitioners must check all output from an AI scribe for accuracy in order to meet their professional obligations. The software vendor is not the accountable party for what ends up in your record.
It changes the work rather than removing it. Volumes of drafted text go up, and the checking, correcting and governing of that text becomes the skilled part of the role. Reviewing an AI draft against a clinical source needs more knowledge than typing from dictation did, not less.
No. People come into it from administration, reception, aged care, allied health support and from outside health altogether. The terminology, anatomy, records knowledge and privacy and medico-legal obligations are taught from the ground up in the 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation. Typing speed builds with practice during the course rather than being an entry barrier. Entry requirements and fees are on the course page.

Interested in the work of making a health record trustworthy? Explore the 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation, delivered 100% online and self-paced with daily intakes, or read our healthcare documentation career guide.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Nationally recognised training delivered online across Australia. This article discusses publicly reported material about AI scribes in Australian healthcare, including ABC News reporting of 14 August 2026 and the Digital Rights Watch report, and is general information rather than clinical, legal or privacy advice.

11288NAT

Diploma of Healthcare Documentation

Produce, check and safeguard health information. 100% online and self-paced. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Healthcare Documentation.

Book a call

Healthcare documentation news

Monthly insights for people who work with health information.

RACGP Standards Sixth Edition: What Changes for Practice Managers

On 26 August 2026 the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners published the sixth edition of its Standards for general practices, the first full rewrite since 2017. In a GP clinic, the Standards are what an accreditation surveyor works through, and the reason a practice keeps the policies, registers and evidence it keeps.

Someone has to carry that. In most practices it is the practice manager. If you already run a practice, the sixth edition changes what sits in your evidence folder. If you are thinking about moving into practice management as a career, it is a clear window into what the job is made of.

The shape of the sixth edition

The sixth edition is organised into four standards, plus an optional fifth for practices that carry out point-of-care testing.

Standard What it covers
Foundations of general practice Planning, governance, the team, information management, digital security, privacy, digital health technologies and artificial intelligence
Clinical governance Records, results and recalls, transitions of care, clinical risk, infection control, equipment and medicines
Patient participation Practice information, communication, consent, accessibility, complaints, consumer engagement and access to care
Continuous quality improvement The practice-wide system for measuring performance and acting on it
Point-of-care testing (optional) Only for practices providing point-of-care testing, once the first four standards are met

Terminology changed with it. What the fifth edition called indicators are now criteria, and the requirements underneath them are sub-criteria. According to the RACGP, the new framework is focused on outcomes, with criteria setting out what a practice is expected to achieve rather than prescribing how to achieve it. Aspirational criteria are labelled as such and are not required for accreditation.

So a small solo clinic and a large multi-site group can meet the same criterion in different ways, and each has to be able to explain its own approach. That is a different skill from following a template.

Artificial intelligence is now an accreditation matter

The sixth edition introduces a criteria set for artificial intelligence with no equivalent in the fifth edition. It covers the safe and accountable use of AI, and the evaluation and monitoring of that use. A separate new criterion covers the governance of digital health technologies more broadly, taking in telehealth, patient portals, remote monitoring and secure messaging.

This is the change most likely to catch a practice off guard, because AI arrived in general practice faster than the paperwork did. Ambient scribes are now common in Australian consulting rooms. Under the sixth edition, a practice using them needs to show how patients are told and consent is obtained, how clinicians stay accountable for decisions supported by an AI tool, how patient data is handled, and how the tool is reviewed over time.

In practical terms that comes down to a documented process, a consent step, a review date and a named owner. It is work, and it lands on the practice manager. Our guide to the RACGP Standards for practice managers covers how the fifth edition worked, which is a useful baseline for reading what has moved.

Digital records, and what a health summary has to hold

Paper-based systems on their own are no longer accepted. Hybrid arrangements are still recognised, such as care delivered in residential aged care, but a practice’s own system needs to be digital.

Record content has been tightened alongside it. Coded health summaries and a recorded allergy status are both expected, and consultations and clinical communications belong in the patient’s record.

Cyber security sits with information continuity and recovery under the Foundations standard, and it has been expanded. If your practice has never written down what happens when the clinical system goes offline, that is a gap worth closing. Our guide to practice management software in Australia covers the systems side in more depth.

Environmental sustainability arrives as a requirement

New criteria cover climate resilience, sustainability strategies, and sustainability leadership and accountability, and the theme runs through several of the standards rather than sitting in one corner. Monitoring of environmental performance now sits under continuous quality improvement, with environmental impact measurement as an aspirational criterion.

Accountability is the part to act on first. A practice needs someone whose job includes this, which is a name against a responsibility, exactly the kind of thing a practice manager sets up.

Small practices are not expected to start with a formal programme. RACGP explanatory material does not prescribe particular actions, and reducing energy use, cutting waste and choosing better suppliers all count.

The governance work that lands on the practice manager

Several criteria in the planning and governance area are new, and they are practice-manager work almost by definition:

  • Mission, vision and values. A stated purpose the practice can point to, and monitor.
  • Document control and version management. Policies and procedures that are current, accurate and findable, with a clear record of which version is in force.
  • A governance framework. Who decides what, and how those decisions are recorded.
  • A clinical risk management system. Risks identified, managed and reported to practice leadership, rather than handled case by case.
  • Recognising and responding to abuse and violence. A new criterion under induction and training.

Strategic and operational planning were already there in some form, but both have been expanded. Informed consent for procedures and treatments is new under the patient participation standard, and results, recalls and reminders have been strengthened around documenting each attempt to contact a patient.

As a list it looks like more paperwork. As a job description it is why practice management is a career rather than a set of admin tasks.

When does this actually start?

Not yet. The Standards are published, but the accreditation timetable is not set. RACGP has said implementation arrangements under the National General Practice Accreditation Scheme will be communicated by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Practices will need to meet the sixth edition after a transition period, and the detail of that period is what to watch for.

That gap is useful. Five things are worth doing now, before any deadline is announced:

  • Read the published sixth edition, including the guidance sections under each criterion, rather than working from a summary.
  • Use the RACGP’s mapping document to see where fifth edition content has moved, while noting the College’s own warning that a mapped criterion is not necessarily the same requirement.
  • List every AI and digital health tool in use, clinical and administrative, and note who owns each one.
  • Check your policy library for version control. If nobody can say which version is current, that is the first fix.
  • Name the person responsible for environmental sustainability, and give the role a small, achievable first task.

Practices mid-way through an accreditation cycle have a natural window for this work. Our explainer on the GP practice accreditation cycle sets out how that rhythm runs.

Common questions

The RACGP published the Standards for general practices sixth edition on 26 August 2026, replacing the fifth edition that had been in place since 2017.
That has not been confirmed. The RACGP has said implementation arrangements under the National General Practice Accreditation Scheme will be communicated by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and that practices will need to meet the sixth edition after a transition period. Watch for that announcement rather than assuming a date.
The main additions are criteria covering artificial intelligence, governance of digital health technologies, environmental sustainability and climate resilience, a clinical risk management system, document control and version management, a stated mission and values, a governance framework, informed consent for procedures and treatments, and antimicrobial stewardship. Several existing requirements have also been expanded, including clinical information systems, cyber security, patient health records, and results and recalls.
Not as its main system. The criterion on clinical information systems has been expanded so that the practice’s system needs to be digital. Hybrid arrangements are recognised where the situation calls for them, such as care provided in residential aged care, but a paper-based practice record system on its own does not meet the criterion.
No. Practice managers come from reception and administration roles inside health, from nursing and allied health, and from management roles in other industries. The HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management covers the business, legal, governance and people-management side of running a healthcare practice. Entry requirements and fees are on the course page.

Interested in the role that turns a new set of Standards into a working practice? Explore the HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management, delivered 100% online and self-paced over 12 months with daily intakes, or read the practice management career guide.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Nationally recognised training delivered online across Australia. This article summarises publicly available material about the RACGP Standards for general practices sixth edition and is not a substitute for the published Standards or accreditation advice.

HLT57715

Diploma of Practice Management

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Practice Management.

Book a call

Healthcare practice news

Monthly insights for GP, specialist, and allied health teams.

When an Insurer Asks for Full Patient Records: A Practice Manager’s Guide

An email lands on a Tuesday morning. A private health insurer is auditing claims your practice has submitted, and it wants clinical records. Not the notes for one disputed episode, but the full history for a list of patients. The contract you signed says you will co-operate with audits. The Privacy Act says a patient’s health information does not go to a third party without that patient’s consent. Those two things point in opposite directions, and someone has to decide what happens next. In most Australian practices, that someone is the practice manager.

In August 2026 the ABC reported that hospitals, dentists, physiotherapists and specialists have been asked for far more clinical detail than the claim under audit would seem to require. If you are considering a career in practice management, this is a good example of what the job actually involves.

What the law expects before a record leaves the practice

Health information is treated as sensitive information under the Privacy Act 1988. That gives it stronger protection than an address or a phone number, and the rules about sharing it are stricter.

Australian Privacy Principle 6 covers use and disclosure. Broadly, a practice can use health information for the reason it was collected, which is providing care. Sending it somewhere else is a disclosure, and that generally needs either the patient’s consent or a specific exception written into the law. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner puts it plainly in its health privacy guidance: where a request for records comes from a third party, the practice should only release the information if the patient has consented.

Consent also has to be worth something. For sensitive information it needs to be express rather than assumed, and the patient needs to understand what is being released and to whom. A signature collected years ago at new-patient registration is thin ground to stand on.

The point that catches practices out is the relationship between a contract and a statute. A provider agreement can oblige a practice to co-operate with a reasonable audit. It cannot rewrite the Privacy Act. Dr Bashi Kumar-Hazard of the University of Sydney Law School told the ABC that a contract cannot contain terms which contravene existing law, and that requesting patient notes outside the episode of care without consent should void it. Our guide to the Privacy Act for Australian medical practices covers the obligations in more detail.

Who in the practice actually handles the request

The worst outcome is the one where nobody owns it. A request arrives, it gets forwarded to whoever is at the front desk that day, and files go out because the sender sounded official and impatient.

A practice that handles this well has decided in advance who receives these requests, and the answer is usually the practice manager, working with the principal or owner. From there the sequence is consistent:

  • Get it in writing. A phone call is not a request. Ask for it in writing, naming the specific claims it relates to and the basis being relied on.
  • Log it. Date received, who sent it, what was asked for, and what was provided. This log is your evidence if the request is later disputed.
  • Check the scope against the claim. If the audit concerns three item numbers billed in March, work out what an auditor would reasonably need to verify them.
  • Deal with consent properly. Contact the affected patients, explain in plain terms what is being requested and by whom, and record their answer. A refusal is a valid answer, and the practice needs a process for what follows.
  • Release only what was agreed, and record it. Note what was sent, when, in what format, and to whom.

None of that is glamorous. All of it is what lets a practice explain its decisions later.

How to narrow a request without refusing to co-operate

Audits are a normal part of a system that pays out large sums. Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David has defended audit activity as responsible management of roughly 27 billion dollars in annual healthcare payments, and noted that audits do find incorrect claiming. Refusing outright is not realistic.

The productive move is to narrow rather than refuse. A written reply that says the practice will co-operate, sets out what it can release for the claims in question, and asks the auditor to explain why anything beyond that is needed, is a co-operative response. It is also a written record that the practice took its privacy obligations seriously.

Practical questions are fair too. Who will receive the records, and are they qualified to assess the clinical decisions being reviewed? Merv Saultry of the Independent Dentist Network told the ABC about a case where auditors did not hold the dental qualifications needed to assess complex work. How will the records be stored and destroyed once the audit closes?

The Australian Private Hospitals Association has been blunt about the pattern, with chief executive Brett Heffernan describing some audit conduct as rogue behaviour, and in March 2026 the association joined Catholic Health Australia in calling for a mandatory code of conduct covering insurer contracting. Whether that arrives or not, the practice still has to answer the email sitting in the inbox today.

When to stop and escalate

A practice manager runs the process but does not carry the legal risk alone.

Escalate when the request goes well beyond the episodes under audit, when patients have declined consent and the requester keeps pressing, when there is a threat of a repayment demand or removal from a provider network, or when you are not confident of the right answer. Go to the principal or owner first, then the practice’s professional indemnity insurer or medico-legal adviser, the relevant association, and a lawyer with health privacy experience. Patients who believe their information was mishandled can complain to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, and practices can seek guidance from the same office.

Knowing where your authority ends is part of the skill, not a gap in it. Handling private billing, WorkCover and DVA claims takes the same instinct: resolve what you can, and route the rest.

This article is general information, not legal advice. A practice facing an audit dispute should get advice about its own circumstances.

Why this lands on the practice manager’s desk

People still picture practice management as rosters and reception. The insurer audit story shows what it has become. One request can involve privacy law, a commercial contract, patient communication, records governance, revenue, and a relationship with a funder the practice depends on.

That is why the role is a serious career with a serious skillset behind it. The HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management covers the operational, financial, legal and people-management side of running a healthcare practice, including managing information and working within legal and ethical frameworks. It is 100 percent online and self-paced over 12 months with daily intakes, and it suits people already working in reception, administration or nursing, as well as managers moving into health from other industries.

Frequently asked questions

An insurer can ask. Whether the practice can lawfully provide it is a separate question. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner advises that where a third party requests records, the practice should release them only if the patient has consented. A provider contract can create an obligation to co-operate with a reasonable audit, but it does not override the Privacy Act.
A refusal is a valid answer and should be recorded. The practice can tell the auditor that consent was sought and declined, and keep co-operating on the records it is able to release. If the requester responds with pressure, a repayment demand or a threat about network status, escalate to the practice owner and a medico-legal or legal adviser rather than resolve it at the front desk.
It should be assigned in advance, not improvised. In most practices the practice manager receives and manages the request, working with the principal or owner, and escalates when it goes beyond the claims under audit. What matters is that one person owns the process and keeps a written log of what was asked for and what was released.
Yes. It is classified as sensitive information under the Privacy Act 1988, so stricter rules apply to collecting, using and disclosing it. Consent generally needs to be express rather than implied, and the person needs to understand what is being shared and with whom.
No. Practice managers come from reception and administration roles inside health, from nursing and allied health, and from management roles in other industries. The HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management teaches the business, legal and people-management side of running a healthcare practice from the ground up. Entry requirements and current fees are on the course page.

Interested in the role that answers the hard email? Explore the HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management or read the practice management career guide.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Nationally recognised training delivered online across Australia.

HLT57715

Diploma of Practice Management

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Practice Management.

Book a call

Healthcare practice news

Monthly insights for GP, specialist, and allied health teams.

ISO 9001 Is Being Rewritten: What the 2026 Update Means for Auditors

ISO 9001 is one of the most widely used management system standards in the world, and it is being rewritten. The updated version, referred to as ISO 9001:2026, has moved through its final drafting stage and is expected to be published around September 2026. Organisations that hold certification will then have a transition period of about three years to move across.

For anyone working in or training towards healthcare quality auditing, that timeline matters. A revision of this size does not just change a document. It creates several years of gap analysis, internal audit work, retraining and re-certification across every certified organisation in the country, and that work has to be done by auditors.

Here is where the revision is up to, what appears to be changing, and what a transition looks like from an auditor’s desk.

Where the revision is up to

ISO 9001 has not had a substantial revision since 2015, so this is the first significant update in about a decade.

The Draft International Standard, the version released for public comment, was published in August 2025. The Final Draft International Standard, the last stage before publication and one that normally allows only editorial changes, went to ballot within ISO and the European Committee for Standardization around April 2026. Certification bodies including BSI have since confirmed that draft was released, and publication is expected in September 2026.

Be precise about both dates, because neither has happened yet. September 2026 is an expectation based on the current schedule, not a confirmed release date, and the three year transition runs from whenever publication actually occurs. Treat any firm end date you see quoted as an estimate until ISO publishes.

What appears to be changing

Guidance published by certification bodies so far points to an evolution rather than a rebuild. The process approach, the risk-based thinking and the overall clause structure that auditors already know are staying, and the changes sit inside that frame. The themes that come up consistently across guidance from BSI, DQS and TUV are:

  • Quality culture and ethical behaviour. Leadership responsibilities are expanded so that top management is expected to promote a quality culture and ethical behaviour, and awareness requirements extend to cover them too.
  • Risk and opportunity pulled apart. Clause 6.1 is subdivided so that actions to address risks and actions to pursue opportunities are considered separately, rather than being treated as one combined requirement.
  • Climate change in organisational context. Climate change and sustainability enter the standard through the analysis of organisational context and interested parties. Guidance from DQS is explicit that this does not turn ISO 9001 into an environmental or ESG standard.
  • Strategic direction. A clearer link between quality policy, quality objectives and the organisation’s longer term strategy.
  • Change management reinforced. Requirements covering changes to the quality management system are strengthened, so the system keeps delivering its intended results while it changes.
  • A much larger Annex A. BSI describes roughly 15 pages of guidance clarifying structure, terminology and clauses, which is a substantial jump on what auditors have had previously.

Until ISO publishes the final text, read all of this as well informed expectation from bodies close to the drafting process, not as settled requirements. That distinction matters if you are advising anyone.

Why this lands in Australia too

ISO standards are international, but they arrive here through a local pathway. ISO 9001 is adopted in Australia and New Zealand as AS/NZS ISO 9001, and that is a straight adoption rather than a modified local version, so the requirements match what the rest of the world works to.

The certification layer is local as well. JAS-ANZ, the Joint Accreditation System of Australia and New Zealand, accredits the certification bodies that certify organisations here. JAS-ANZ accreditation is not legally compulsory, but it is what most government and major commercial contracts specify, which makes it the practical benchmark.

In Australian healthcare, ISO 9001 rarely stands alone. Hospitals work to the NSQHS Standards, registered aged care providers to the strengthened Aged Care Quality Standards, and NDIS providers to the NDIS Practice Standards. Plenty of organisations run ISO 9001 alongside one of those, because the sector framework covers clinical safety and quality while ISO 9001 covers the management system underneath it. Our guide to ISO 9001 and the NSQHS Standards walks through which framework applies where.

What a transition period means for auditors

This is the part that turns a standards announcement into a workforce story. A three year transition window is not three quiet years. It is a queue of work with a deadline on the end of it, and it hits two groups at once.

Inside certified organisations, someone has to run a gap analysis against the new text, update the quality manual and procedures, revise the internal audit programme and audit criteria, retrain internal auditors, brief the governing body on the leadership and quality culture requirements, and then audit against the new version before the certification body arrives. In healthcare organisations already carrying NSQHS or aged care obligations, that work sits on top of an existing accreditation calendar rather than replacing it.

At the certification bodies, every auditor on the scheme has to be retrained and requalified before they can audit to the revised standard, and transition audits then have to be scheduled across an entire client base inside the same window. That is why transitions tend to create a crunch rather than a smooth ramp.

Transitions do not reduce demand for auditors, they concentrate it. An organisation running a quiet, stable management system suddenly needs someone who can read a revised standard properly, work out what actually changed, and evidence it. That skill is the core of the job. Our guides to becoming a lead auditor in Australia and to quality auditor career pathways cover the internal, external and consulting routes.

How to get ready

If you already audit, the useful move now is familiarisation rather than rewriting anything. Read the published guidance from the certification bodies, note where clause 6.1 splits and where the culture and context requirements land, and wait for the final text before you touch a procedure.

If you are moving into the field, the more useful realisation is that this revision is normal. Standards are living documents on review cycles. The NSQHS Standards are heading for a third edition, the aged care standards were strengthened in 2025, and ISO 9001 is on its own cycle now. An auditor who can only recite the current version of one standard has a short career. An auditor who understands audit method, how to plan an audit, gather and weigh evidence, write a defensible finding and track corrective action, carries that skillset across every framework and every revision.

That is what the BSB50920 Diploma of Quality Auditing from TalentMed is built around, with ISO 9001, the NSQHS Standards and clinical governance woven through the learning. It is delivered 100 percent online and self-paced over 12 months, with intakes year round, so you can study while you work. Current fees, payment options and the full unit list are on the course page.

Frequently asked questions

Publication is expected around September 2026. The standard has passed its Final Draft International Standard stage, the last step before release, and certification bodies including BSI have confirmed that draft was issued. Until ISO formally publishes, the date remains an expectation based on the current schedule rather than a confirmed release date.
Certification bodies have consistently described a transition period of about three years from publication. Organisations certified to ISO 9001:2015 would need to move across within that window to keep certification current. Because the period runs from actual publication, treat any end date quoted before release as an estimate.
No. Published guidance describes it as an evolution rather than a rebuild. The process approach, risk-based thinking and the overall clause structure carry over from the 2015 version. The changes concentrate on leadership and quality culture, a clearer separation of risks from opportunities, climate change entering the analysis of organisational context, reinforced change management, and a much larger Annex A of guidance.
It applies here. ISO 9001 is adopted in Australia and New Zealand as AS/NZS ISO 9001, a direct adoption rather than a modified local version, and certification bodies operating here are accredited by JAS-ANZ. In healthcare it commonly sits alongside sector frameworks such as the NSQHS Standards or the NDIS Practice Standards rather than replacing them.
No. Quality auditing is a process discipline: planning an audit, gathering and weighing evidence, writing findings and tracking corrective action. The BSB50920 Diploma of Quality Auditing teaches those skills from the ground up, which is why the field suits career changers. The method is what transfers between standards, and between revisions of the same standard.

Ready to build a career around a skillset that outlasts any single version of any single standard? Explore the BSB50920 Diploma of Quality Auditing or read the full quality auditing career guide.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Nationally recognised training delivered online across Australia.

BSB50920

Diploma of Quality Auditing

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Quality Auditing.

Book a call

Healthcare quality news

Monthly updates on standards, accreditation and audit careers in Australian health and aged care.

Health Care Is Australia’s Most Breached Sector: What It Means for Documentation Careers

On 6 July 2026 the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner published its data breach figures for the 2025 calendar year, and one sector sat at the top of the list again. Health service providers reported more data breaches than any other industry in Australia. Ten days later, a network of more than 60 general practice clinics confirmed that patient records had been taken in a cyber attack. Two stories, three weeks apart, pointing at the same thing: the health information Australia’s care system runs on is valuable, exposed, and somebody’s job to protect.

That somebody is, more and more often, a trained documentation professional. If you are looking at a career in healthcare documentation, this is worth understanding, because privacy is not a side topic in this work. It is a core part of the role.

Health care is Australia’s most breached sector

The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, usually shortened to the OAIC, runs the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme. Organisations covered by the Privacy Act 1988 must tell the regulator and the affected people when a breach is likely to cause serious harm, so its figures are one of the better views we have of what is going wrong. The picture for 2025, published on 6 July 2026, was the busiest since the scheme began in 2018:

  • 1,205 data breaches were notified across all sectors, up 8 per cent on the 1,112 reported in 2024.
  • Health service providers reported the most of any sector, with 225 notifications, or 19 per cent of the national total.
  • 716 of the 1,205 notifications came from malicious or criminal attack rather than accident.

Australian Privacy Commissioner Carly Kind described the threat to Australian organisations as “substantial and rising year on year”.

What a breach looks like inside a real clinic

The general practice case reported in mid July 2026 shows the shape of it. Partnered Health, which operates a network of more than 60 clinics, said it became aware on 23 June 2026 that a malicious actor had accessed some of its data. It confirmed that 21 clinics across New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory may have been affected, and reported the incident to the OAIC, the Australian Cyber Security Centre and law enforcement. Public reporting described the exposed information as including names, dates of birth, addresses and contact details, Medicare numbers, private health insurance and concession card details, and clinical material such as consultation notes, referral letters and pathology and diagnostic results.

Read that list again from a documentation point of view. It is not a list of database fields, it is a list of documents. Consultation notes, referral letters and reports are exactly the records a healthcare documentation specialist produces, checks and files. The security question and the documentation question are the same question.

Why this is a documentation job, not only an IT job

It is tempting to file data breaches under technology and move on. Firewalls matter, and they are not the documentation team’s call. But much of what protects health information is decided in the daily handling of records, and that is documentation work:

  • Right patient, right record. A report filed to the wrong patient is both a clinical risk and a privacy breach. Careful checking at the point of documentation prevents both.
  • Only what is needed, only to who needs it. Knowing who may see a record, and what can be released to an insurer or another practice, is a judgement records staff make constantly.
  • Secure handling of work in progress. Audio files and draft letters are real health information with the protection often stripped off. Home based and contract work raises the stakes here, not lowers them.
  • Accurate, complete, contemporaneous records. When something goes wrong, the record is the evidence. Poor documentation turns a manageable incident into an unprovable one.
  • Knowing what to do in the first hour. Spotting that an email went to the wrong address and escalating it immediately is often the difference between a contained incident and a notifiable one.

None of that is a technology control. All of it is trained behaviour, and it is much of why employers value people who have been taught the privacy and medico legal side of records rather than picking it up as they go. It is the same discipline that makes someone good at the day to day documentation role in the first place.

What the law actually expects

You do not need to be a lawyer to work with health records, but you do need to know the shape of the rules, because health information gets stricter treatment than ordinary personal information under Australian privacy law. The parts worth knowing early:

  • The Notifiable Data Breaches scheme. Under the Privacy Act 1988, an organisation suspecting an eligible data breach must take all reasonable steps to assess it within 30 days. If serious harm is likely, both the affected individuals and the OAIC must be told.
  • Health records are kept for years. Retention rules vary by state and territory. In New South Wales, Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory, privacy law generally requires a provider to keep records for seven years, or for a child until they turn 25.
  • More information is shared by design. From 1 July 2026, under the Australian Digital Health Agency’s share by default reforms, written pathology and diagnostic imaging reports go to My Health Record by default unless an exception applies. That makes disciplined handling more important, not less.

The obligations sit on the organisation, but they are met or missed by individuals doing ordinary tasks properly.

Where this fits in a healthcare documentation career

Healthcare documentation is usually pictured as typing, and typing is part of it. But the qualification is built around a wider job: producing, checking and safeguarding the health information the care system runs on. Privacy sits in the middle of that, alongside clinical terminology, editing and the growing work of reviewing what AI tools produce.

The 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation is designed around that scope. It covers the Australian health system and how records move through it, privacy, ethics and medico legal responsibilities, advanced clinical terminology, producing and editing healthcare documentation, and the emerging area of AI in healthcare documentation, where a qualified human checks what the software drafted.

Graduates work in roles including medical records and health information officer positions, AI documentation review, documentation and transcription services, in house roles in practices and hospitals, and independent contracting from home. It is also a stepping stone toward the HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding for people who enjoy the classification side of health information, a move a lot of documentation professionals make. Career changers are welcome, because the course teaches the role from the ground up and assumes no medical or nursing background.

Common questions

Health service providers reported 225 of the 1,205 breaches notified to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner in 2025, or 19 per cent of the national total, more than any other sector. Health organisations hold a rich combination of identity and clinical information, keep it for years, and share it widely, which lifts both the value to attackers and the number of ways it can be exposed.

Yes, at a working level. You are not expected to give legal advice, but handling health information means understanding the Privacy Act 1988 obligations that apply to health records, who may access a record, what can be released and to whom, how long records are kept, and what to do when something goes wrong. Privacy, ethics and medico legal responsibilities are a core study area in the 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation for that reason.

Work from home is common in this field and it is workable, but it shifts responsibility onto the individual. Secure handling of audio files and drafts, controlled access to systems, and knowing your employer’s or client’s privacy requirements become part of the job rather than something the office handles for you. Good training covers this directly, because employers and contracting clients ask about it.

Train for the job the records actually need

Australian health care will keep generating more records and sharing them more widely. There is room for people who know how health information should be handled.

The 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation teaches the full scope of the role, from clinical terminology and document production through to the privacy and medico legal responsibilities that come with it. It is 100 per cent online, self paced over 12 months, with daily intakes.

Explore the 11288NAT Diploma of Healthcare Documentation to see the units, fees and how to enrol, or read our guide to getting started in healthcare documentation.

Sources: OAIC Notifiable Data Breaches statistics for 2025 (published 6 July 2026) and NDB scheme guidance; Australian Digital Health Agency share by default reforms; public reporting of the Partnered Health cyber incident, July 2026.

TalentMed Pty Ltd is a Registered Training Organisation, RTO 22151.

11288NAT

Diploma of Healthcare Documentation

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Healthcare Documentation.

Book a call

Healthcare documentation news

Monthly insights for people who produce, check and safeguard health information.

GP Payroll Tax: What It Means for Practice Managers

Ask a practice owner what keeps them up at night in 2026 and payroll tax will be near the top of the list. In the past few years, state revenue offices have started treating some payments to contractor GPs as wages, which can make a practice liable for payroll tax on money it only ever passed through to its doctors. The RACGP has called it a threat to practice viability and campaigned hard for relief. It is one of the biggest financial questions in Australian general practice right now, and it has landed squarely on one desk in particular: the practice manager’s.

If you are thinking about a career in practice management, this is worth understanding, because it is a clear example of what the role is really about. Not booking appointments, but keeping a business compliant and viable while the rules shift underneath it. Here is what the payroll tax issue is, and why it puts a skilled practice manager at the centre of a modern clinic.

Why payroll tax suddenly matters to general practice

For decades, most general practices ran on a simple arrangement. Doctors worked as independent contractors, not employees. The practice provided the rooms, staff, software and billing and took a service fee, while the doctors billed Medicare in their own right and kept the rest. Because the doctors were contractors, practices generally assumed payroll tax, a state tax on employee wages, did not apply to them.

A run of tribunal and court decisions challenged that assumption. The most cited is Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue in New South Wales, where a medical practice was found liable for payroll tax on payments to its contractor GPs. The reasoning turned on how the money actually flowed. Where the practice collected the Medicare benefit and then paid the doctor their share, revenue authorities argued those payments looked enough like wages to fall inside the payroll tax net, even though the doctor was a contractor on paper.

That single shift in interpretation changed the maths for thousands of practices. A tax nobody had budgeted for could suddenly apply, potentially backdated across several years. For a sector already under pressure from flat Medicare rebates and rising costs, the prospect was serious enough that the RACGP made it a headline advocacy issue, describing the flow-through effect on patients as a “patient tax”.

Why it is a state-by-state puzzle

What makes payroll tax hard to manage is this: it is a state and territory tax, so there is no single national rule. Each jurisdiction sets its own thresholds, its own rates, and its own position on contractor GPs, and those positions have kept changing.

Broadly, states have responded in different ways. Some have introduced amnesties covering past periods, giving practices a window to get their arrangements in order without being pursued for historical liabilities. Some have legislated exemptions for the wages tied to bulk-billed GP services, so that the more a practice bulk bills, the more of its GP payments fall outside payroll tax. Others have taken a broader approach to exempting contracted GP payments altogether. The exact mechanism, and whether it applies to your practice, depends on which state you are in and what the current rules say.

The practical upshot is that a practice manager in Queensland, one in Victoria and one in New South Wales can be working to three different sets of rules for the same kind of arrangement. Because the settings keep moving, the reliable move is always to check the current position with your own state or territory revenue office and your practice’s accountant, rather than assume the rule you remember still holds.

What practice managers actually do about it

This is where the role earns its keep. Payroll tax is not something a practice can solve once and forget. It sits across contracts, billing, record-keeping and accreditation all at once, and holding those threads together is practice management work.

In practice, a capable manager is usually the person who:

  • Understands how the practice’s service agreements are structured, and can explain to the owners where those arrangements sit relative to the current state rules.
  • Keeps clean documentation of how doctors are engaged and how money flows, so the practice can substantiate its position if a revenue office ever asks.
  • Tracks the numbers that matter, including the practice’s bulk-billing rate, because in several states the payroll tax exemption is tied directly to bulk-billed services.
  • Works closely with the practice’s accountant and, where needed, its lawyers, translating professional advice into day-to-day systems the front and clinical teams can actually follow.
  • Watches for change, so a new ruling or a new exemption is picked up and acted on rather than missed.

It also connects to the wider compliance picture. The definition of a “contractor” at the heart of the payroll tax question is the same one that shapes how a practice reads the RACGP Standards, structures its staffing and engagement models, and handles its Medicare billing. Get the engagement model right and several problems get easier at once. Get it wrong and the same mistake shows up in several places.

None of this means a practice manager needs to be a tax lawyer. It means being the person who understands the business well enough to ask the right questions, keep the right records, and make sure expert advice actually gets implemented.

Why this makes practice management a career worth training for

Payroll tax is a useful window into the modern practice manager’s job because it shows the level the role now operates at. A clinic is a small business with tight margins, real regulatory exposure and a team of clinicians who need to be free to focus on patients. Somebody has to hold the operational and compliance side together, and that somebody is now, more often than not, a qualified, professional practice manager rather than whoever happened to be at the front desk longest.

That is the skill set the HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management is built around. It covers the finance, operations, human resources, compliance and quality foundations that let a practice manager step into exactly these situations with confidence, from billing and business systems to workplace policy and risk. It will not turn you into a tax specialist, and it does not need to. It gives you the grounding to run a healthy practice and to know when and how to bring in specialist advice.

Practice management also travels well. The same core skills apply across general practice, specialist rooms, allied health, dental and beyond, and career changers are welcome, because the diploma teaches the role from the ground up.

Common questions

Because several tribunal and court decisions found that payments to contractor GPs can count as wages for payroll tax purposes, depending on how the money flows through the practice. The most cited is Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue in New South Wales. Whether payroll tax applies to a particular practice depends on its arrangements and its state’s current rules.

No. Payroll tax is a state and territory tax, so thresholds, rates and the treatment of contractor GPs vary by jurisdiction. States have responded to the GP payroll tax issue differently, with a mix of amnesties for past periods and exemptions, some tied to bulk-billed services. Always check the current position with your own state or territory revenue office.

A practice manager typically keeps the documentation of how doctors are engaged and how money flows, tracks the figures that affect any exemption such as the bulk-billing rate, works with the practice’s accountant and lawyers, and makes sure professional advice is turned into everyday systems. They are not expected to be a tax specialist, but they hold the business detail that the advice depends on.

No. The HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management teaches the finance, operations, compliance and human resources foundations of the role from the ground up. You learn enough to run a practice well and to know when to bring in specialist advice, rather than needing to be a specialist yourself.

Yes. HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management is approved for VET Student Loans (VSL) for eligible students, which can help with tuition for those who qualify. Approval and eligibility criteria apply. Current fee and payment details are on the course page.

Train for the role at the centre of a modern practice

The HLT57715 Diploma of Practice Management teaches the finance, operations, human resources, compliance and quality skills that let a practice manager keep a clinic viable and compliant, even as the rules change. It is 100% online and self-paced over 12 months, with intakes every day of the year, and it is approved for VET Student Loans for eligible students.

Explore the Diploma of Practice Management →

This article is general information about the practice manager’s role and is not tax, financial or legal advice. Payroll tax rules differ by state and territory and change over time. Practices should confirm their obligations with their own state or territory revenue office and their accountant.

Sources: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) payroll tax advocacy and resources; Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW); state and territory revenue office guidance on payroll tax and medical practices.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Course information is current at the time of writing. For current fees, intakes and entry requirements, see the course page.

HLT57715

Diploma of Practice Management

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. VSL approved for eligible students. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Practice Management.

Book a call

Healthcare practice news

Monthly insights for GP, specialist, and allied health teams.

New Coding Rules from 1 July 2026: What Clinical Coders Need to Know

On 15 June 2026, the rules Australian clinical coders work to changed again. The Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority (IHACPA) published a new batch of coding rules as part of its National Coding Advice, and they are current from 1 July 2026.

If you are new to the field, quarterly rule changes might sound like a lot to keep up with. They are not a warning sign. They are how the system is designed to work. Australian clinical coding runs on a living classification, not a fixed rulebook that sits still for years. Knowing how to find the latest advice, read it, and apply it is a core part of the job. Here is what the newest advice contains, what a coding rule actually looks like in practice, and what all of it means if you are training as a coder right now.

What changed on 1 July 2026

IHACPA maintains the classification system used to code every admitted patient episode in Australian hospitals. That system has three parts: ICD-10-AM for diagnoses, ACHI for procedures, and the Australian Coding Standards (ACS) that govern how the first two are applied.

The current version is the Thirteenth Edition, used for separations from 1 July 2025. A new edition arrives roughly every three years, released alongside an update to the AR-DRG classification that hospitals are funded through. On that cycle, the Fourteenth Edition is due in 2028.

Three years is a long time in medicine. New drugs reach the ward, new procedures become routine, and new conditions get named. If coders had to wait for the next edition every time something novel turned up, the data would drift out of step with what hospitals were actually doing.

That gap is filled by National Coding Advice, which IHACPA publishes quarterly, in March, June, September and December. The June 2026 batch landed on 15 June and is current at 1 July 2026. It has three parts:

  • Coding Rules: national answers to specific coding questions.
  • Coding Rules for provisional assignment: guidance on the placeholder codes used for brand new diseases and technologies.
  • Frequently Asked Questions: responses to questions about Thirteenth Edition changes and the education program that supports them.

One point matters more than any other here, and it is the one people new to coding most often get wrong. National Coding Advice works alongside the Australian Coding Standards rather than replacing them, and it is not something you can quietly skip. Where a coding rule covers the situation in front of you, that is the advice you follow. The standards remain the governing rules, and the advice tells you how to apply them to a case the books do not settle on their own.

What a coding rule actually looks like: the e-bike problem

Abstract explanations only get you so far, so here is a real rule from the 15 June 2026 batch. It is about e-bikes.

E-bikes are everywhere now, and Australian emergency departments are seeing the injuries that come with them. So a reasonable question for a health department to ask is: how many people are being admitted to hospital after an e-bike crash, and is that number going up?

Until last month, nobody could answer it. Not because the data was missing, but because of how the classification works. An e-bicycle is a bicycle with foot pedals and an electric motor that helps you pedal. ICD-10-AM defines it as a motorcycle, in the Chapter 20 definitions for transport accidents. So a rider who came off an e-bike on a bike path and a rider who came off a motorbike on a highway were coded into the same bucket. Once the record was coded, the two were indistinguishable.

The rule fixes that. After consulting its Classifications Clinical Advisory Group, IHACPA switched on a placeholder code, U77.0 National use of U77.0 [Injury involving e-bicycle]. The coder still assigns the usual motorcycle external cause code, then adds U77.0 alongside it, and the episode becomes countable.

The rule then works a scenario through in full. A patient is admitted with a fractured elbow after colliding with a car in traffic while riding an e-bicycle. The injury itself gets coded, as you would expect. Then, to record how it happened, the coder assigns:

  • V23.40, the code for a rider of a motorised bicycle hit by a car in traffic. This is the external cause, and it comes from the motorcycle block, because that is where the classification puts e-bikes.
  • U77.0 National use of U77.0 [Injury involving e-bicycle]. This is the new placeholder, and it is what makes the e-bike visible in the data.
  • A place of occurrence code and an activity code, recording where it happened and what the person was doing.

Notice what the rule does. It does not just hand over one code. It walks through the complete set the episode needs and says where each one comes from. A coder who assigned the external cause code and stopped there would leave the record incomplete, and it would not survive an audit.

Now the part that shows why this is a reasoning job rather than a lookup job. An e-scooter is not an e-bike, as far as the classification is concerned. ICD-10-AM treats an e-scooter as a pedestrian conveyance, which puts it under ACS 2009 Pedestrian accidents, a completely different path through the books. Two devices that look similar parked on the same footpath, two different routes through the classification. The same June batch gave e-scooters their own placeholder, U77.1, and other powered pedestrian conveyances a third, U77.2. The advice is pointed about the boundaries, too: U77.1 is for e-scooters only, and is not to be used for mobility scooters.

Knowing that distinction is the job. No amount of searching the index for “e-bike” gets you there on its own.

The result is national consistency. The same case gets coded the same way in Perth and in Hobart. That is what makes national hospital data, and the activity based funding that runs on it, trustworthy. It is also what lets a road-safety team eventually ask the e-bike question and get a real answer.

Placeholder codes, and how the system moves fast

U77.0 is worth pausing on, because it is an example of a wider mechanism.

Some things cannot wait three years for a new edition. A previously unknown disease, a technology that arrives in theatre for the first time, or a vehicle that appears on every street corner in the space of a few years, needs to be captured in the data straight away.

The classification handles this with provisional, or placeholder, codes. They sit in reserved blocks and get switched on when they are needed:

  • ICD-10-AM U00 to U49, for new diseases of uncertain cause or emergency use. These are activated on advice from the World Health Organization.
  • ICD-10-AM U75 to U77, for diseases of national significance. These are activated in consultation with the Classifications Clinical Advisory Group.
  • ACHI [8888], for new or emerging health technologies, also activated in consultation with that group.
  • ACHI [8889], for emergency use interventions where data needs collecting immediately. IHACPA activates these itself.

Placeholder codes never stand alone. They are assigned in addition to the relevant ICD-10-AM or ACHI code, and sequenced after it.

It is a quietly clever piece of design. It lets a national dataset react to something brand new within weeks, without anyone rewriting the classification.

What this means if you are training as a coder

The practical lesson in all of this is simple. Staying current is not an optional extra bolted onto the job. It is the job.

IHACPA is direct about how to do that. Its own instruction is to work from the latest online version of National Coding Advice, or from the Australian Classification Exchange (ACE), rather than relying on a copy you downloaded at some point. IHACPA corrects errors in published rules without notifying anyone when the change does not alter the intent, so a PDF sitting in your downloads folder can quietly fall out of date. The rules and FAQs for the Thirteenth Edition will eventually be retired altogether when the Fourteenth Edition arrives and the content is absorbed into it.

For a working coder, this habit is what keeps audit findings away. State health departments run coding audits, and an unusual case coded without checking whether a national rule already covers it is a predictable place for a discrepancy to show up. The coder who thinks to check is the coder whose work stands up.

Becoming a clinical coder means learning that whole workflow, not just the codes. You work from the alphabetic index to the tabular list, apply the Australian Coding Standards, then check National Coding Advice for anything the standards leave open. Coders who keep up with the quarterly cycle are also the ones who stay connected to the wider field. Clinical coders in Australia are represented by the Clinical Coders’ Society of Australia (CCSA).

Worth being clear on one thing: clinical coding is not a licensed or registered profession in Australia. There is no board to register with and no licence to hold. What employers hire on is demonstrated skill with the classification, which is what a qualification is for.

None of this requires a clinical background. It requires attention to detail, comfort with structured reference material, and the discipline to check rather than assume.

Common questions

Quarterly. IHACPA publishes it in March, June, September and December. The most recent batch was published on 15 June 2026 and is current at 1 July 2026.

No. It works alongside them. The Australian Coding Standards remain the governing rules, and National Coding Advice tells you how to apply those standards to specific scenarios the books do not resolve on their own. It is not something you can skip, though. Where a coding rule covers the situation in front of you, that is the advice you follow.

ICD-10-AM classifies an e-bicycle as a motorcycle, so the external cause code comes from the motorcycle block. From the June 2026 advice, the coder also assigns the placeholder code U77.0 National use of U77.0 [Injury involving e-bicycle], which is what separates e-bike injuries from motorcycle injuries in the national data. An e-scooter is different again: the classification treats it as a pedestrian conveyance, with its own placeholder code, U77.1.

The Thirteenth Edition, used for separations from 1 July 2025. The classification is updated roughly every three years, alongside the AR-DRG classification used for hospital funding.

No. Nobody does, and nobody is expected to. What matters is knowing that National Coding Advice exists, knowing that it is refreshed every quarter, and building the habit of checking the current online version before you code an unusual case.

No. The HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding teaches the anatomy, physiology, medical terminology and classification skills from the ground up. Coders come from administration, allied health, science and a wide range of other backgrounds.

Learn to code to the current Australian standard

The HLT50321 Diploma of Clinical Coding teaches ICD-10-AM, ACHI and the Australian Coding Standards as they are actually used in Australian hospitals, including how to work with National Coding Advice as it updates. It is 100% online and self-paced over 12 months, with intakes every day of the year.

Explore the Diploma of Clinical Coding →

Sources: Independent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority (IHACPA), National Coding Advice: Coding Rules and FAQs for ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS Thirteenth Edition (current at 1 July 2026), and the IHACPA ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS classification pages.

TalentMed Pty Ltd, RTO 22151. Course information is current at the time of writing. For current fees, intakes and entry requirements, see the course page.

HLT50321

Diploma of Clinical Coding

100% online and self-paced over 12 months. Start any time.

Explore the course →

Prefer to talk it through?

Book a free, no-obligation call with a TalentMed course adviser about the Diploma of Clinical Coding.

Book a call

Clinical coding news

Monthly updates on classifications, coding standards and coder careers in Australia.

Go to Top